Upper Menu

Archive | Infringement

hard drive detail

CAFC holds “User Interface” Does Not Include Other Machine-Type Interfaces

On February 10, 2016 the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) decided the case of Convolve, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology v. Compaq Computer Corp. and Seagate Technology, Inc. (February 10, 2016, 2014-1732, CAFC). The technology at issue in the case involved improvements in computer hard drives described in US Patent No. 6,314,473 […]

Continue Reading 0
Rosebud versus Adobe

Federal Circuit holds Actual Notice, not Constructive Notice, is Required to Collect Reasonable Royalties under 35 U. S. C. Section 154 (d)

In Rosebud LMS INC. v. Adobe Systems Incorporated (CAFC, 2015-1428, February 9, 2016) the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) affirmed the District Court’s grant of summary judgment that Adobe Systems Inc. was not liable for pre-issuance damages under 3 5 U. S. C. Section 154 (d). Rosebud filed three suits against Adobe […]

Continue Reading 0
TM-litigations

US Patent and Trademark Office Launches Online Toolkit for Trademarks

        The US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has launched an online toolkit to help individuals with basic information concerning trademarks.  The website is located here. The Trademark Toolkit includes a link to: General information about trademarks; How to respond to a Cease and Desist letter; What to do if an infringement […]

Continue Reading 0
money

Federal Circuit Clarifies Standard for Defendants Seeking Award of Attorney’s Fees

On December 26, 2013, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit decided Kilopass Technology, Inc. v. Sidense Corporation, (Case No. 2013-1193). In this case, the defendant-appellant, Sidense Corporation (Sidense), had appealed from the district court’s denial of its motion for attorney’s fees under 35 U.S.C. § 285. In its opinion, written by Judge O’Malley, […]

Continue Reading 0
images (1)

U.S Supreme Court Will Review Standard for Induced Infringement of a Claimed Method When Infringement is Split Among Multiple Parties

On January 10, 2014, the U.S. Supreme Court granted certiorari in Limelight Networks, Inc. v. Akamai Technologies, Inc. The petitioner in the case, Limelight Networks (Limelight), appealed from the en banc opinion of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Akamai Technologies, Inc. v. Limelight Networks, Inc. and McKesson Technologies, Inc. v. […]

Continue Reading 0