On April 16, 2010 the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (“CAFC”) upheld the District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia jury verdict that the asserted claims of two Verizon patents (US Patents 6,282,574 and 6,104,711) were invalid and the asserted claims of four Verizon patents (US Patents 6,430,275; 6,292,481; 6,137,869 and 6,636,597) [...]
Tag Archives | Cox Cable
Schedule
an In-Person or
Telephone Appointment
-
Ninth Circuit Clarifies Requirements for Vicarious and Contributory Copyright Infringement Claims
May 20, 2013
-
Federal Circuit Applies Collateral Estoppel to Patent Claim Terms Not Previously Construed
May 17, 2013
-
2013 Offshore Technology Conference Sets Record Number of Attendees and Displays Impressive Innovation
May 11, 2013
-
Federal Circuit Affirms $20.8 Million Patent Infringement Judgment Against Home Depot
March 2, 2012
-
US Patent and Trademark Office Offers Awards for Patents for Humanity
February 9, 2012
-
Federal Circuit: Recklessness Best Determined by a Judge
July 3, 2012
Amazon
Appeal
Apple App Store
Blackberry
Blogs
board of patent appeals and interferences
Bose
CAFC
Common-Interest Agreement
Cox Cable
Cracking Wireless
Damages
Eastern District of Texas
Facebook
featured
federal circuit
Fraud
Freedom of Information Act
Global Economy
Google
Infringement
Iphone
Jailbreaking
Japanese Tsunami Disaster
Kathy Bates
KSR v. Teleflex
Laches
Litigation
Louis Vuitton
Mattel
Negligence
NTP
Pravel
Recession
Redskins
Research in Motion
Research in Motion
software patent
The North Face
The South Butt
Tivo
trademark
ttab
Tyco
Wave
RECEIVE CURRENT IP UPDATES
Testimonials
“Mr. Pravel was local counsel on cutting edge litigation involving the Internet and suing domain names in rem for trademark infringement. He was a strong advocate of the client's position.”
Darren Quinn, Esq.







