In THE CRASH DUMMY MOVIE, LLC v. MATTEL, INC. (CAFC 2009-1239, April 16, 2010), the Federal Circuit found that Mattel’s failure to file a timely Section 8 declaration of use did not negate Mattel’s intent to resume its use of the mark. Mattel, via its predecessor in interest Tyco, had registered the mark CRASH DUMMIES [...]
Archive | Intent to Use RSS feed for this section
Failure to File Section 8 Declaration of Use Does Not Negate Evidence of Intent Not to Abandon Mark
By jwpravel on April 19, 2010 in Abandonment, Intent to Use, Renewal, Section 8 Declaration, Trademarks
BLACK MAIL refused for Lack of Proof of Bone Fide Intent to Use the Mark
Research in Motion Limited (“RIM”), well known owner of the BLACKBERRY mark, opposed the registration of the mark BLACK MAIL by the NBOR Corporation (“NBOR”). Research In Motion Limited v. NBOR Corporation, Opposition No. 91179284 to application Serial No. 77090059 filed on January 24, 2007. Applicant filed the mark BLACK MAIL for: “computer software for [...]
Schedule
an In-Person or
Telephone Appointment
-
Impact of US Supreme Court’s Prometheus Patentable Subject Matter Decision
May 18, 2012
-
Amendments or Arguments after Final Rejection may be Accepted under new USPTO Pilot Program
May 9, 2012
-
Digitization of Copyright entries Nearly Complete at US Library of Congress
May 2, 2012
- Sound Trademark Dispute: Ride the Ducks v. Bay Quackers August 26, 2009
- 274 green patents filed in second quarter August 27, 2009
- IBM Files US Patent for Facebook Remote Control September 1, 2009
Amazon
Appeal
Apple App Store
Blackberry
Blogs
Bose
CAFC
Common-Interest Agreement
Cox Cable
Cracking Wireless
Damages
Eastern District of Texas
Facebook
featured
Fraud
Freedom of Information Act
Global Economy
Google
Infringement
Ipad
Iphone
Jailbreaking
Japanese Tsunami Disaster
Kathy Bates
KSR v. Teleflex
Laches
Litigation
Louis Vuitton
Mattel
Negligence
Nintendo
NTP
playstation
Pravel
PS3
Recession
Redskins
Research in Motion
Research in Motion
Sony
The North Face
The South Butt
Tivo
Tyco
Wave
RECEIVE CURRENT IP UPDATES
Testimonials
“Jim provided excellent patent advice for me since 1996. He was very efficient and kept on top of me for answers and really understood the engineering concepts and developed excellent patents. I would recommend Jim without hesitation for this type of work.”
Mike B.








