Archive | Infringement RSS feed for this section

Federal Circuit Reaffirms Structure Requirements for Means-Plus-Function Claims

On February 13, 2013, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued its opinion in Function Media, L.L.C v. Google Inc., __ F.3d __ (Fed. Cir. 2013). In the decision, written by Judge Reyna, the Federal Circuit affirmed the district court’s invalidation of one of the plaintiff’s patents as indefinite. The court found that [...]

Share
Read full story Comments { 0 }

Google Threatens to Sue Youtube MP3 Conversion Site

Google recently wrote a letter on June 8 to the owner of the website Youtube-MP3.org, stating that it must stop its activities within seven days of Google’s letter.  Youtube-MP3.org is a site devoted to converting Youtube videos to audio MP3s, that is widely popular, accessed by 1.3 million people each day. Google and Youtube argue [...]

Share
Read full story Comments { 0 }

Shape of Hookah Pipe not Protectable with Copyright

The recent case of Inhale v. Starbuzz Tobacco, Inc. held that the shape of a water container to be used in a hookah device is not afforded protection under the Copyright Act.  Inhale made a water container that had a specific design on it – a skull and crossbones, in 2008 and registered it with the [...]

Share
Read full story Comments { 0 }

American Universities Sued for Copyright Infringement

In September 2011, a group of authors, as well as the Authors Guild and Australian Society for Authors, brought one of the largest copyright infringement suits in history against five major American Universities.  These universities included University of Michigan, University of California, University of Wisconsin, Indiana University, and Cornell University.  The suit, filed in the U.S. District [...]

Share
Read full story Comments { 0 }

An Algorithm for Every Function

On April 9, 2012, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit upheld the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania’s decision to invalidate patent claims asserted by Noah Systems, Inc. (“Noah”) against Intuit, Inc. (“Intuit”), because the claims were indefinite.  At the center of this case was U.S. Patent No. 5,875,435 [...]

Share
Read full story Comments { 0 }